Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/11/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/11/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
MARTHA JUNIOR, G. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
GERALDO BUENO MARTHA JUNIOR, CNPTIA. |
|
Título: |
Potential land-saving effects from integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2., 2021. Proceedings reference. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2021. p. 989-997. |
|
ISBN: |
978-65-994135-4-4 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
WCCLF 2021. Evento online. |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT. A bold sustainable intensification strategy involves a multiple approach combining increased yields, cropping intensity, and resource-use efficiency. Well-designed and implemented integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems (ICLS) can achieve those goals. In this paper I discuss the potential land-saving effects arising from the recovery of low-productive pastures through ICLS and the potential land-saving effects from productive livestock systems already in rotation with high-yielding soybean crops. The recovery of low productive pastures offers an impressive way of sparing land from cultivation. Land-saving effects resulting from turning low productivity pastures into productive ones through ICLS may reach 11 ha spared/ha recovered but figures around 3 to 5 ha spared/ha recovered would probably be more realistic. The potential for generating land-saving effects in high-productive ICLS is lower (up 1.40 ha spared/ha) because land-productivity is close to or is already at the attainable yield level. However, productive ICLS have a higher potential to deliver environmental benefits and their already high levels of land-productivity indicate that associated rebound effects are unlikely. Thus, productive ICLS will likely promote land-sparing effects with no leakage. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agricultural R&D; Efeitos de economia de terra; Integrated crop-livestock systems; Intensificação sustentável; Jevons´ paradox; Pesquisa e desenvolvimento agrícola; Produtividade da terra; Sistemas integrados lavoura-pecuária; Sustainable intensification. |
|
Thesagro: |
Economia da Terra; Uso da Terra. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Land use change. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/227706/1/PC-Potential-land-WCCLF-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02318nam a2200277 a 4500
001 2136084
005 2021-11-11
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-65-994135-4-4
100 1 $aMARTHA JUNIOR, G. B.
245 $aPotential land-saving effects from integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: WORLD CONGRESS ON INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK-FORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2., 2021. Proceedings reference. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2021. p. 989-997.$c2021
500 $aWCCLF 2021. Evento online.
520 $aABSTRACT. A bold sustainable intensification strategy involves a multiple approach combining increased yields, cropping intensity, and resource-use efficiency. Well-designed and implemented integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems (ICLS) can achieve those goals. In this paper I discuss the potential land-saving effects arising from the recovery of low-productive pastures through ICLS and the potential land-saving effects from productive livestock systems already in rotation with high-yielding soybean crops. The recovery of low productive pastures offers an impressive way of sparing land from cultivation. Land-saving effects resulting from turning low productivity pastures into productive ones through ICLS may reach 11 ha spared/ha recovered but figures around 3 to 5 ha spared/ha recovered would probably be more realistic. The potential for generating land-saving effects in high-productive ICLS is lower (up 1.40 ha spared/ha) because land-productivity is close to or is already at the attainable yield level. However, productive ICLS have a higher potential to deliver environmental benefits and their already high levels of land-productivity indicate that associated rebound effects are unlikely. Thus, productive ICLS will likely promote land-sparing effects with no leakage.
650 $aLand use change
650 $aEconomia da Terra
650 $aUso da Terra
653 $aAgricultural R&D
653 $aEfeitos de economia de terra
653 $aIntegrated crop-livestock systems
653 $aIntensificação sustentável
653 $aJevons´ paradox
653 $aPesquisa e desenvolvimento agrícola
653 $aProdutividade da terra
653 $aSistemas integrados lavoura-pecuária
653 $aSustainable intensification
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
